By Kristina Fiore, Staff Writer, MedPage Today
Published: May 16, 2012
Reviewed by Zalman S. Agus, MD; Emeritus Professor, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania.
Take Posttest
Action Points
WASHINGTON -- A pilot program focused on collaborative care may improve outcomes and reduce costs associated with end-stage renal disease (ESRD), researchers found.
Patients in the Medicare demonstration project met all Quality Incentive Program (QIP) metrics for much of the study, and by the second year of the program had significantly lower costs compared with fee-for-service patients, Allen Nissenson, MD, chief medical officer of DaVita in El Segundo, Calif., and colleagues reported at the National Kidney Foundation meeting here.
The program was implemented in several DaVita dialysis centers in southern California, serving about 550 patients, and was conducted from 2008 to 2010. All patients had aggressive preventive care, management of comorbid conditions, and monitoring by a care manager throughout the entire program.
Nissenson said the program focused on integrating healthcare across various aspects of care, not just the dialysis units, and involved teams comprising clinicians, nurse practitioners, case managers, and pharmacists. In addition to medical management, the program also incorporated nutrition education, fluid management, and other components that made it a more holistic approach to care, he said.
DaVita received a single monthly payment per patient "to cover it all," Nissenson told MedPage Today. "It's sort of like the ultimate bundling."
He and his colleagues evaluated outcomes and costs associated with the demo project. They found that patients hit nine out of 11 QIP targets in the first half of 2008, and then hit all 11 targets after that point through 2010.
The program was able to reduce catheterizations, eliminate drug interactions, and increase vaccination rates, with more than 90% of patients receiving influenza and pneumococcal vaccinations, Nissenson told MedPage Today.
Patients in the program also had fewer hospitalizations than those enrolled in typical Medicare fee-for-service programs, he said.
"The amount of money we can save by avoiding hospitalizations is more than that required to make the initial investment" in implementing the program, he said.
In a cost-effectiveness analysis between the demo costs and the Medicare 5% sample -- a dataset representative of the Medicare fee-for-service population -- the researchers found that costs were lowered with the program, especially after the first year.
Overall medical costs per member per year were 5% lower than fee-for-service programs in 2008, which wasn't significant, but they were a significant 10% lower in 2009 (P<0.01) and an estimated 11% lower in 2010 (2010 Medicare 5% data were unavailable so the researchers adjusted 2009 data to estimate the comparisons).
Inpatient costs with the demo program were a non-significant 7% lower than Medicare 5% data in 2008 and a significant 18% lower in 2009 (P<0.0001), as well as an estimated 18% lower in 2010.
Costs associated with dialysis, however, were slightly but not significantly higher, they reported.
Nissenson said a significant portion of the savings is likely attributable to lower hospitalization costs, and that DaVita is looking to reproduce the project in the context of an Accountable Care Organization (ACO).
Lynda Szczech, MD, president of the NKF, said in a statement that a holistic approach to "caring for kidney patients can lead to better patient outcomes and reduced healthcare costs."
"It's really a win-win situation," she added. "Everyone from the patient on up to the government can benefit from comprehensive disease management care."
The researchers reported no conflicts of interest.
Primary source:National Kidney Foundation
Source reference:
Franco E, et al "Disease management program ESRD patients have lower overall medical costs" NKF 2012.
Add Your Knowledge ™
|