A t 87, Lochan Bakshi's sharp mind has decided when to free his failing body.
The retired biology professor has thought hard about death and about the way he wants it to arrive. After all, he's seen men like himself hunched over in chairs in long-term-care centres, their minds absent, unaware there hasn't been a visitor for years.
His cousin had a massive stroke that stole his memory and his mind. He would sit in his own mire until the next nursing visit, bathed by his caring wife. "It struck me: why should he be like this? Why not just finish it?
He's just a vegetable," Bakshi said to her. "'You mean kill my husband? I can't kill him,'" she responded.
"Nobody should be in that situation," Bakshi says, his cheeks apple-flushed, his sharp eyes framed with straying silver eyebrows and wire-rimmed bifocals. "I am convinced that I don't want to be like that."
So in about two months, give or take, he'll refuse his thrice-weekly dialysis treatments, he says, then wait seven to 10 days for his kidneys and the rest of his body to fail. He'd prefer an injection to put him to sleep peacefully.
Bakshi wants to open the debate on euthanasia in Alberta following a landmark report released last month in Quebec that suggested the province legalize doctor-assisted euthanasia in "exceptional circumstances" for those who are terminally ill.
The Dying with Dignity Commission, made up of nine members from all political parties, studied the issue for two years before rejecting the idea of legalizing assisted suicide - performed by a family member - but recommending people should be able to seek aid to die in a medical environment.
"Some sufferings can't be relieved satisfactorily and the seriously ill who want to put an end to their sufferings (that) they deem senseless, come up against a refusal that isn't in line with Quebec's values of compassion and solidarity," reads the report, released March 21.
But the provinces can do little when the federal criminal code makes it illegal to counsel, aid or abet someone to commit suicide, says Erin Nelson, a professor in the University of Alberta's law faculty who specializes in healthcare ethics.
"I think it's going to become inevitable that more and more people will wish to be able to make decisions like this, about dying with dignity as they perceive it, if their life is no longer what they wish to live."
Nelson said the government should start the conversation, rather than leave it to individuals and families. "One of the arguments that Joe Arvay made is, it's unfair to burden those people with that responsibility.
It's not just an individual thing. It actually is a bit of a societal discussion that needs to take place."
But governments are unlikely to take the lead, he says. "There's just not a lot of political gain to be made by getting into this."
If governments did instigate public debate on euthanasia, they would be inevitably and unfairly accused of trying to save health dollars by letting people die, says Nelson.
That, even though an Angus Reid poll conducted in late 2010 found 63% of Canadians generally support euthanasia. It goes up to 78% in Quebec. In Alberta, support dips to 48%.
Bakshi said he easily can reconcile his belief system with the right to die through injection. He doesn't like the idea of refusing dialysis, then awaiting death for one week while on pain killers.
"I absolutely believe that God does not want you to be miserable and, if that is so, why do we keep hanging on to the little thread of life at the very end?" Bakshi said.
"God did not want us to suffer and I'm helping God."
© Copyright (c) Postmedia News
|