Dialysis world news


FLCN gene-mutated renal cell neoplasms: Mother and daughter cases with a novel ... - UroToday

Canadian Urological Association (CUA)

65th Annual Meeting

June 27 - 29, 2010

Delta Prince Edward Hotel
Charlottetown, PEI Canada

...

 
Team hailed for getting patients pedalling - This is Leicestershire

More than 30 patients have benefited from exercise bikes designed to be used during kidney dialysis.

People whose kidneys have failed need to spend hours in hospital each week, connected to a dialysis machine that removes impurities from blood.

  1. ?

A team of researchers from the University of Leicester, the University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust and the University of Loughborough have been working on improving life for kidney patients by giving them a chance to exercise.

Known as The Leicester Kidney Exercise Team, they have adapted exercise bikes for dialysis patients so they can use them while the dialysis machines clean their blood.

The team is one of four short-listed for the British Medical Journal's Sport and Exercise Team of the Year Award.

The award is a new category in the journal's Improving Health Awards, which will be held at the Park Lane Hilton hotel in London on May 23.

One of the team, Dr Alice Smith, said: "I'm delighted the team has been nominated, they are a fantastic group and give far more than would normally be expected of their roles."

...

 
Personal Touch Home Care Of Ohio to Pay $35000 After Firing Employee Because ... - Jobmouse

Home health care services provider Personal Touch Home Care, based in Hamilton, Ohio, with 50 locations in 13 states, will pay $35,000 and furnish other remedial relief to settle a disability discrimination lawsuit filed by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), the agency announced Tuesday.

According to the EEOC’s suit, Personal Touch fired Pamula Calfee because of her disabilities: renal failure, COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) and asthma. Calfee had worked for Personal Touch since 2000 and had no problems performing her job even with her disabilities.

Such alleged conduct violates the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA). The EEOC filed suit in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, Cincinnati Division after first attempting to reach a pre-litigation settlement

Personal Touch consented to a two-year consent decree in which it agreed to pay $35,000 in compensation and also agreed to provide training to all of its supervisors and managers in its Southwest Ohio region concerning disability discrimination.

“Treating an employee badly based on a physical impairment violates the very core of the ADA, and the EEOC will continue to fight for the rights of disability discrimination victims,” said Laurie Young, regional attorney for the EEOC’s Indianapolis District Office.

The EEOC enforces federal laws prohibiting employment discrimination. Further information about the EEOC is available on the agency’s website at www.eeoc.gov.

...

 
Medical tests and treatments that physician groups say most patients should ... - Washington Post

— Don’t do brain CT scans or MRI’s on patients who have fainted with no evidence of seizures or neurological problems. (American College of Physicians)

— Don’t treat tumors in end-stage cancer patients whose disease has failed to respond to multiple curative therapies, are ineligible for experimental treatments, are confined to a bed or chair more than half the day, and there is an absence of evidence supporting clinical value of further anti-cancer treatment. (American Society of Clinical Oncology)

— Don’t order CT scans or prescribe antibiotics for patients with uncomplicated upper respiratory conditions. (American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology)

— Avoid routine pre-hospital admission or preoperative chest X-rays for patients with no indication of heart or lung disease. (American College of Radiology)

— Do not repeat colorectal cancer screening by any method for 10 years after negative results from a high-quality colonoscopy in patients with an average risk profile. (American Gastroenterological Association)

— Don’t perform sophisticated cardiac imaging tests on patients who have a low risk of heart attack or death based on physical examination and other markers. (American Society of Nuclear Cardiology)

— Don’t start long-term kidney dialysis without a thorough discussion and shared decision-making process including patient and family. (American Society of Nephrology)

— Don’t perform stress cardiac imaging on patients without heart symptoms unless they are in high-risk groups, such as diabetics. (American College of Cardiology)

___

Online: www.choosingwisely.org

Copyright 2012 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

...

 
Doctors questioning some medical tests - Morning Sentinel
1:00 AM

Doctors questioning some medical tests

Nine groups of physicians challenge exams for dozens of health conditions

BY RICARDO ALONSO-ZALDIVAR, Associated Press

WASHINGTON -- Old checklist for doctors: Order that test, write that prescription. New checklist for doctors: First ask yourself if the patient really needs it.

MEDICAL TESTS AND TREATMENTS YOU SHOULD QUESTION

Nine medical societies have released a list of 45 tests and treatments that patients should question and doctors should avoid in most cases as part of an effort to cut wasteful spending. Here is a sample:

• Don’t do MRIs or other imaging scans for low back pain within the first six weeks, unless serious underlying conditions are suspected. (American Academy of Family Physicians)

• Don’t do brain CT scans or MRIs on patients who have fainted with no evidence of seizures or neurological problems. (American College of Physicians)

• Don’t treat tumors in end-stage cancer patients whose disease has failed to respond to multiple curative therapies, are ineligible for experimental treatments, are confined to a bed or chair more than half the day, and there is an absence of evidence supporting clinical value of further anti-cancer treatment. (American Society of Clinical Oncology)

• Don’t order CT scans or prescribe antibiotics for patients with uncomplicated upper respiratory conditions. (American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology)

• Avoid routine pre-hospital admission or preoperative chest X-rays for patients with no indication of heart or lung disease. (American College of Radiology)

• Do not repeat colorectal cancer screening by any method for 10 years after negative results from a high-quality colonoscopy in patients with an average risk profile. (American Gastroenterological Association)

• Don’t perform sophisticated cardiac imaging tests on patients who have a low risk of heart attack or death based on physical examination and other markers. (American Society of Nuclear Cardiology)

• Don’t start long-term kidney dialysis without a thorough discussion and shared decision-making process including patient and family. (American Society of Nephrology)

• Don’t perform stress cardiac imaging on patients without heart symptoms unless they are in high-risk groups, such as diabetics. (American College of Cardiology)

—The Associated Press

Nine medical societies representing nearly 375,000 physicians are challenging the widely held perception that more health care is better, releasing lists Wednesday of tests and treatments their members should no longer automatically order.

The 45 items listed include most repeat colonoscopies within 10 years of a first such test, early imaging for most back pain, brain scans for patients who fainted but didn't have seizures, and antibiotics for mild- to-moderate sinus distress.

Also on the list: heart imaging stress tests for patients without coronary symptoms. And a particularly sobering recommendation calls for cancer doctors to stop treating tumors in end-stage patients who have not responded to multiple therapies and are ineligible for experimental treatments.

Dr. Christine Cassel, president of the American Board of Internal Medicine, said the goal is to reduce wasteful spending without harming patients. She suggested some may benefit by avoiding known risks associated with medical tests, such as exposure to radiation.

"We all know there is overuse and waste in the system, so let's have the doctors take responsibility for that and look at the things that are overused," said Cassel. "We're doing this because we think we don't need to ration health care if we get rid of waste." Her group sets standards and oversees board certification for many medical specialties.

The recommendations come at a time when American health care is undergoing far-reaching changes. No matter what the Supreme Court decides on President Barack Obama's health overhaul, employers, lawmakers, insurers and many doctors are questioning how the United States spends far more on medical care than any other economically advanced country and still produces mediocre results overall.

Until now, the health care system has rewarded doctors for volume. Now the focus is shifting to paying for results and coordination. That explains the urgency for doctors themselves to identify areas of questionable spending.

It's unclear how much money would be saved if doctors followed the 45 recommendations rigorously. Probably tens of billions of dollars, and maybe hundreds of billions over time. That would help, but come nowhere near solving, the problem of high health care costs.

The nation's medical bill hit $2.6 trillion in 2010. A major quandary for cost-cutters is that most of the spending is attributable to a relatively small share of very sick people. Just 5 percent of patients accounted for half the total costs among privately insured people, according to a recent study from the IMS Institute for Healthcare Informatics.

Dr. James Fasules of the American College of Cardiology said the goal is to begin changing attitudes among patients and doctors.

"We kind of have a general feeling that if you don't get a test, you haven't been cared for well," said Fasules. "That has permeated American culture now." The new advice isn't meant to override a doctor's judgment, Fasules added, but to inform and support decisions.

The recommendations will be circulated to consumers and doctors by a coalition calling itself Choosing Wisely, which includes employer groups, unions, AARP and Consumer Reports. Neither the insurance industry nor the federal government was involved in process.

Each of the nine medical societies submitted five tests or treatments they viewed as overused. Their work was coordinated by a foundation that's an offshoot of Cassel's group. Eight other medical societies are developing additional recommendations, Cassel said.

The medical societies don't have any power of enforcement, and fear of malpractice lawsuits may well prompt many doctors to keep ordering as many tests as ever.

Insurers will certainly take a close look at the recommendations, but what they do may be limited. That's because most of the questionable tests and treatments in the lists don't particularly stand out in the avalanche of bills processed daily by insurance companies.

Take a recommendation for no annual EKGs for low-risk patients with no heart symptoms. Dr. John Santa, director of the Consumer Reports Health Ratings Center, said he used to routinely order EKG's when he was a general adult medicine practitioner. EKGs cost $50 to $60. A medical assistant would do the tests, and it would take Santa just a couple of minutes to read them. Yet 2 percent to 3 percent of his income came from EKGs, enough to make a difference in a tight year.

"It's very difficult for an insurance company to tell the difference when an EKG is being used as a diagnostic tool and when it is being used as a screening test," said Santa. "It would probably cause more trouble for insurance companies."

The medical groups that participated are: American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology; American Academy of Family Physicians, American College of Cardiology, American College of Physicians, American College of Radiology, American Gastroenterological Association, American Society of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Nephrology, and American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

Were you interviewed for this story? If so, please fill out our accuracy form

Send Question/Comment to the Publisher


...

 
<< Start < Prev 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 Next > End >>

Page 473 of 2630
Share |
Copyright © 2024 Global Dialysis. All Rights Reserved.

Notice: Undefined variable: query in /home/globaldi/public_html/components/com_joomlawatch/class.joomlawatch.db.php on line 129

Notice: Undefined variable: query in /home/globaldi/public_html/components/com_joomlawatch/class.joomlawatch.db.php on line 129

Notice: Undefined variable: query in /home/globaldi/public_html/components/com_joomlawatch/class.joomlawatch.db.php on line 129

Notice: Undefined variable: query in /home/globaldi/public_html/components/com_joomlawatch/class.joomlawatch.db.php on line 129

Notice: Undefined variable: query in /home/globaldi/public_html/components/com_joomlawatch/class.joomlawatch.db.php on line 129